| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 armzngunz |
Date sent: 2016/11/26 11:30:05
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6gBnizjTM4Clearly the US slightly overpowers Russia, and with the US allies, Russia don't stand a chance. |
 Sparqy Back-up |
Date sent: 2016/11/26 11:31:50
This isn't counting nuclear armament right? If it is, no one would win - which is why the argument of a country vs country strength contest in military is completely useless when nuclear weapons are present. |
armzngunz |
Date sent: 2016/11/26 11:42:21
This is putting the numbers up against eachother. We can't know if nukes would be used, but in a hypothetical scenario where the US and Russia fight, without using nukes, it is clear that Russia would lose. |
 DreemurrTheDreamer |
Date sent: 2016/11/26 12:05:58
goku. goku would win. |
 Vulturboy |
Date sent: 2016/11/28 15:12:57
Hypothetically, what if the US attacked Russia in the middle of winter, in Russia? |
armzngunz |
Date sent: 2016/11/28 18:02:53
Going by the numbers, the US would win. However, we can't know for sure, I think the US would win though, due to them having air superiority. |
 Matodir |
Date sent: 2016/11/28 18:53:13
Russians have much more men though, they just keep coming |
 galbby5 |
Date sent: 2016/11/29 05:09:12
bruh if it was a land invasion, Russia wins because their landmass is so big and because of the russian winter. America wins in a naval and aerial fight tho, so ^_^ |
armzngunz |
Date sent: 2016/11/29 14:40:29
The thing is, Russia cannot possibly mobilise as many men as they did during WW2. Modern society and economy won't allow it, nor do they have enough population to do so.During WW2, they lost over 20 million people, which drastically lowered their population, and after the USSR breakup, they lost massive amounts of manpower again, 15% of all soviet ww2 losses were ukrainian. Today's Russia is much weaker and smaller than the USSR, so I don't think the winter would stop the US. |
